MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403334264 · doi:10.1145/3656019.3676897

ACE: Efficient GPU Kernel Concurrency for Input-Dependent Irregular Computational Graphs

2024· article· en· W4403334264 on OpenAlexaff
Sankeerth Durvasula, Adrian Zhao, Raymond Kiguru, Yushi Guan, Zhonghan Chen, Nandita Vijaykumar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceParallel computingKernel (algebra)ConcurrencyDistributed computingMathematicsDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GPUs are widely used to accelerate many important classes of workloads today. However, in this work, we observe that several important emerging classes of workloads, including simulation engines for deep reinforcement learning and dynamic neural networks, are unable to fully utilize the massive parallelism that GPUs offer. These applications tend to have kernels that are small in size, i.e., have few threads and thread blocks that cannot saturate the GPU’s compute resources. Executing independent kernels concurrently is a promising approach to improve parallelism and utilization. However, this inter-kernel concurrency is difficult to leverage in such workloads with existing approaches: First, the inter-kernel dependencies and computational graph are input-dependent and vary each time the application is executed. Second, the computational graphs tend to be irregular, requiring fine-grain scheduling and synchronization; thus incurring significant synchronization overheads if kernel execution is parallelized. In this work, we propose ACE, a new framework that enables lightweight detection of inter-kernel dependencies and low overhead kernel scheduling at runtime. The key idea behind ACE is to perform inter-kernel dependency checks for a small window of kernels at runtime, similar to out-of-order instruction scheduling. This enables concurrent execution of kernels in applications whose computational graphs are input-dependent and require fine-grained scheduling. We propose ACE-SW, a software-only open-source implementation of ACE and ACE-HW, a hardware-software cooperative implementation. ACE-HW further reduces synchronization overheads by reducing communication between the CPU and GPU. We evaluate ACE for deep RL simulation engines and dynamic and static DNNs on both real hardware and a GPU simulator. We demonstrate speedups of up to 2.19 × (1.56 × on average) by improving GPU utilization with concurrent kernel execution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGraph Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207