A phase factor generation using RNNs deep learning algorithm-based PTS method for PAPR reduction of beyond 5G FBMC waveform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Filter Bank Multicarrier (FBMC) is considered one of the strong applicants for a radio system beyond the fifth generation (B5G) that improves spectral access and lowers interference. It utilizes a prototype filter for each sub-carrier, making it best for the beyond fifth generation (B5G) framework. The performance of the FBMC is hugely impacted by the high peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), which lowers the effectiveness of the power amplifier (PA) used in the 5G-based FBMC waveform. The conventional partial transmission sequence (PTS) technique requires high computational complexity due to the need for multiple Inverse Fast Fourier Transforms (IFFTs) and phase optimization, which can increase processing time and system latency. This article proposes a hybrid method combining a partial transmission sequence and recurrent neural network (RNN) known as PTS-RNNs. RNNs improve the performance of the PTS by efficiently predicting optimal phase factors, reducing computational complexity, and lowering the PAPR of the FBMC waveform. The parameters such as PAPR, bit error rate (BER), and power spectral density (PSD) are estimated for 256 sub-carriers under the Rayleigh and Rician channels for FBMC and orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM). The experiment results reveal that the proposed PTS-RNNs method achieves an efficient 55.45 % and 67.56 % power saving performance for Rayleigh and Rician channels, with enhanced PSD performance while preserving the BER compared to the traditional selective mapping (SLM) and PTS methods. It is also noticeable that by adding more sub-blocks and phase parameters, PAPR can be further optimised.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".