MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403424442 · doi:10.13031/ja.15573

Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Climate Change on the Hydrology and Canola Yield Using the DRAINMOD Model

2024· article· en· W4403424442 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the ASABE · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceCanolaHydrology (agriculture)Yield (engineering)Climate changeSoil and Water Assessment ToolWater resource managementAgronomyGeographyDrainage basinGeologyStreamflowGeotechnical engineeringOceanographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highlights Total precipitation and average temperature are projected to increase in the Interlake region of Manitoba. DRAINMOD model results suggest that controlled drainage (CD) would significantly decrease subsurface drainage. Due to dry stress, canola yield is projected to decrease under free drainage (FD) and controlled drainage (CD). Simulation results suggest that capturing, storing, and reusing drainage water could be an adaptive and mitigative strategy for climate change impacts. Abstract. Climate change is a major concern for agricultural production regions like the Canadian Prairies. Therefore, understanding the hydrologic and crop yield response to climate change is important to developing adaptative and mitigative strategies. Downscaled climate model projections from two GCMs for historical (1981-2010), midcentury (2041-2070), and late-century (2071–2100) periods under three representative concentration pathways (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP 8.5) were used as climate inputs to drive a calibrated and validated DRAINMOD model under two water management scenarios: free drainage (FD) and controlled drainage (CD). Field data, including water table depth, was collected for two canola growing seasons at the PESAI (Prairies East Sustainable Agriculture Initiative) research site in Arborg, Manitoba, Canada. The model was calibrated and validated using the 2019 and 2020 water table depth. The projected changes in the climatic variables showed a slight increase in the mean annual precipitation and the mean temperature across the seasons. DRAINMOD simulation results suggest that CD would significantly decrease subsurface drainage, while water loss through evapotranspiration (ET) and surface runoff are projected to increase considerably under CD and FD. Furthermore, results showed that the relative canola yield would decrease under FD and CD. Stressor analysis showed that canola yield reduction was driven by dry stress due to the projected temperature rise, which outweighs the slight increase in precipitation. Simulation results suggest that the capture, storage, and reuse of drainage water could be an adaptive and mitigative strategy to address the predicted impacts. Keywords: Canola yield, Climate change, DRAINMOD model, Subsurface drainage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it