Explaining results of path queries on graphs: Single-path results for context-free path queries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many graph query languages use, at their core, path queries that yield node pairs ( m , n ) that are connected by a path of interest. For the end-user, such node pairs only give limited insight as to why this result is obtained, as the pair does not directly identify the underlying path of interest. In this paper, we propose the single-path semantics to address this limitation of path queries. Under single-path semantics, path queries evaluate to a single path connecting nodes m and n and that satisfies the conditions of the query. To put our proposal in practice, we provide an efficient algorithm for evaluating context-free path queries using the single-path semantics. Additionally, we perform a short evaluation of our techniques that shows that the single-path semantics is practically feasible, even when query results grow large. In addition, we explore the formal relationship between the single-path semantics we propose the problem of finding the shortest string in the intersection of a regular language (representing a graph) and a context-free language (representing a path query). As our formal results show, there is a distinction between the complexity of the single-path semantics for queries that use a single edge label and queries that use multiple edge labels: for queries that use a single edge label, the length of the shortest path is linearly upper bounded by the number of nodes in the graph; whereas for queries that use multiple edge labels, the length of the shortest path has a worst-case quadratic lower bound .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.071 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.033 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".