MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403528310 · doi:10.1215/01636545-11538317

Errata

2024· article· en· W4403528310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRadical History Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Errata for Desiree Valadares, “Uneven Mobilities: Infrastructural Imaginaries on the Hope–Princeton Highway,” Radical History Review 147 (2023): 158–85. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-10637232Desiree Valadares did not acknowledge her use of Ben Bradley’s book British Columbia by the Road: Car Culture and the Making of a Modern Landscape (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2017). She sincerely regrets this error and makes the following corrections to her article:p. 162 The sentence following the subheading Staging the Scenic should read: “Ben Bradley’s history of the Hope–Princeton Highway reveals that when it first opened to the public in 1949, it was considered “neither intrinsically scenic nor particularly interesting.” Endnote: Bradley, British Columbia by the Road, 39.p. 162 An endnote should follow the sentence, “To make this route more interesting to motorists, pullouts and overlooks were carved into the mountains.” Endnote: Bradley, British Columbia by the Road, 39, 76–85.p. 162 The sentence, “These two provincial agencies worked together to manage landscape experiences for motoring tourists along BC highways.” should read: “As shown by Bradley, these two provincial agencies worked together to manage landscape experiences for motoring tourists along BC highways.”p. 162 An endnote should follow the sentence, “The agencies collectively proposed the creation of E. C. Manning Park, a provincial park along the Hope–Princeton route, as a backdrop that would provide both scenic vistas and recreational opportunities.” Endnote: Bradley, British Columbia by the Road, 19–64; and Bradley, “Behind the Scenery.”p. 163 In the sentence that begins, “This 1950s brochure, published by the Daily Province . . . ,” the date should be 1966, not the 1950s.p. 164 The caption for Figure 3 should read: “History on the Highways, published by BCGTB in 1966 and was created by artist Lewis Saw.” The caption should have the following note: This image was reproduced from Ben Bradley’s Flickr album and appears as an illustration in his book, British Columbia by the Road, 208. An original copy of History on the Highways is available at the Royal British Columbia Museum Archives.p. 165 The caption for Figure 4 should read: “Print ads from the late 1940s by BCGTB touting ‘Old mysteries in a new world,’ ‘Visit Alluring British Columbia Canada,’ and ‘British Columbia, Canada: The Vacation-Land That Has Everything.’ Author’s private collection.”p. 165 The first line of the third paragraph should read: “As Bradley argues, ‘Motoring was a radically new way’ of exploring the interior of the province of BC, and driving made motorists feel like ‘active explorers’ of the vast landscapes that surrounded them, rather than ‘passive consumers.’” Endnote: Bradley, British Columbia by the Road, 3.p. 165 An endnote should follow the sentence, “The promotion of automobile tourism in BC should be located within the larger Keynesian expansion and industrial production of roads and automobiles that occurred in the postwar period in Canada.” Endnote: Dawson, Selling British Columbia; Bradley, British Columbia by the Road.p. 166 An endnote should follow the sentence, “The creation and expansion of provincial parks and public history campaigns, such as the Stop of Interest signs program, were intimately tied to highway beautification efforts and tourism promotion along provincial roads. ” Endnote: Bradley offers the first comprehensive scholarly history of the BC Stop of Interest signs, which were introduced in 1958 as a British Columbia Centennial Project. Also see earlier work by Michael Kluckner, Vanishing British Columbia, on “roadside memory,” and BC Stop of Interest signs for the Ghost of Walhachin.p. 168 The sentence, “The Canadian government also looked to road and railway camps for the Doukhobor people (pacifist populations of Ukrainian descent from the Austro-Hungarian empire), who were interned during World War I and whose forced labor helped to build the infrastructure around Banff National Park in Alberta.” should read: “The Canadian government previously interned people of Ukrainian descent from the Austro-Hungarian empire during World War I under the War Measures Act. While interned at Castle Mountain Internment Camp, their forced labor helped to build the road infrastructure around Banff National Park in Alberta.”pp. 181–85 The following references should be added to the reference list:Bradley, Ben. “Behind the Scenery: Manning Park and the Aesthetics of Automobile Accessibility in 1950s British Columbia.” BC Studies, no. 170 (2011): 41–65.Kluckner, Michael. Vanishing British Columbia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4100.287

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadical History ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207