Detection of Hidden Low-Frequency Earthquakes in Southern Vancouver Island with Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low-frequency earthquakes (LFEs) are small-magnitude earthquakes that are depleted in high-frequency content relative to traditional earthquakes of the same magnitude. These events occur in conjunction with slow slip events (SSEs) and can be used to infer the space and time evolution of SSEs. However, because LFEs have weak signals, and the methods used to identify them are computationally expensive, LFEs are not routinely cataloged in most places. Here, we develop a deep-learning model that learns from an existing LFE catalog to detect LFEs in 14 years of continuous waveform data in southern Vancouver Island. The result shows significant increases in detection rates at individual stations. We associate the detections and locate them using a grid search approach in a 3D regional velocity model, resulting in over 1 million LFEs during the performing period. Our resulting catalog is consistent with a widely used tremor catalog during periods of large-magnitude SSEs. However, there are time periods where it registers far more LFEs than the tremor catalog. We highlight a 16-day period in May 2010, when our model detects nearly 3,000 LFEs, whereas the tremor catalog contains only one tremor detection in the same region. This suggests the possibility of hidden small-magnitude SSEs that are undetected by current approaches. Our approach improves the temporal and spatial resolution of the LFE activities and provides new opportunities to understand deep subduction zone processes in this region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".