MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403601805 · doi:10.3390/cryptography8040046

Lightweight Mutually Authenticated Key Exchange with Physical Unclonable Functions

2024· article· en· W4403601805 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCryptography · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Canadian institutionsBank of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Physical unclonable functionComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Authenticated key exchange is desired in scenarios where two participants must exchange sensitive information over an untrusted channel but do not trust each other at the outset of the exchange. As a unique hardware-based random oracle, physical unclonable functions (PUFs) can embed cryptographic hardness and binding properties needed for a secure, interactive authentication system. In this paper, we propose a lightweight protocol, termed PUF-MAKE, to achieve bilateral mutual authentication between two untrusted parties with the help of a trusted server and secure physical devices. At the end of the protocol, both parties are authenticated and possess a shared session key that they can use to encrypt sensitive information over an untrusted channel. The PUF’s underlying entropy hardness characteristics and the key-encryption-key (KEK) primitive act as the root of trust in the protocol’s construction. Other salient properties include a lightweight construction with minimal information stored on each device, a key refresh mechanism to ensure a fresh key is used for every authentication, and robustness against a wide range of attacks. We evaluate the protocol on a set of three FPGAs and a desktop server, with the computational complexity calculated as a function of primitive operations. A composable security model is proposed and analyzed considering a powerful adversary in control of all communications channels. In particular, session key confidentiality is proven through formal verification of the protocol under strong attacker (Dolev-Yao) assumptions, rendering it viable for high-security applications such as digital currency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it