Reconstructing and Hindcasting Sea Ice Conditions in Hudson Bay Using a Thermal Variability Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Hudson Bay seasonal sea ice record has been well known since the advent of satellite reconnaissance, with a continuous record since 1971. To extend the record to earlier decades, a thermal variability framework is used with the surface temperature climatological records from four climate stations along the Hudson Bay shoreline: Churchill, Manitoba; Kuujjurapik, Quebec; Inukjuak, Quebec; and Coral Harbour, Nunavut. The day-to-day surface temperature variation for the minimum temperature of the day was found to be well correlated to the known seasonal sea ice distribution in the Bay. The sea ice/thermal variability relationship was able to reproduce the existing sea ice record (the average breakup and freeze-up dates for the Bay) largely within the error limits of the sea ice data (1 week), as well as filling in some gaps in the existing sea ice record. The breakup dates, freeze-up dates, and ice-free season lengths were generated for the period of 1922 to 1970, with varying degrees of confidence, adding close to 50 years to the sea ice record. Key periods in the spring and fall were found to be critical, signaling the time when the changes in the sea conditions are first notable in the temperature variability record, often well in advance of the 5/10th ice coverage used for the sea ice record derived from ice charts. These key periods in advance of the breakup and freeze-up could be potentially used, in season, as a predictor for navigation. The results are suggestive of a fundamental change in the nature of the breakup (faster) and freeze-up (longer) in recent years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".