MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403620584 · doi:10.3390/stats7040074

Statistical Distribution Theory and Fractional Calculus

2024· article· en· W4403620584 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStats · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalculus (dental)Fractional calculusDistribution (mathematics)MathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is an overview paper. This paper is an attempt to show that fractional calculus can be reached through statistical distribution theory. This paper brings together results on fractional integrals and fractional derivatives of the first and second kinds in the real and complex domains in the scalar, vector, and matrix-variate cases, and shows that all these results can be reached through statistical distribution theory. It is shown that the whole area of fractional integrals can be reached through distributions of products and ratios in the scalar variable case and distributions of symmetric products and symmetric ratios in the matrix-variate cases. While summarizing the materials, the real domain results are also listed side by side with the complex domain results so that a comparative study is possible. Fractional integrals and derivatives in the real domain mean that the parameters involved could be real or complex with appropriate conditions, the arbitrary function is real-valued, and the variables involved are all real. These in the complex domain mean that the parameters could be real or complex and the arbitrary function is still real-valued but the variables involved are in the complex domain. Fully complex domain means the variables as well as the arbitrary function are in the complex domain. Most of the materials on fractional integrals and fractional derivatives involving a single matrix or a number of matrices in the real or complex domain are of this author. Slight modifications of the results, compared with the published works in various papers, are there in various sections. In the paragraph on notations, the lemmas that are taken from this author’s own book on Jacobians are common with published works and hence the similarity index with this author’s works will be high. Section Matrix-Variate Joint Distributions and Fractional Integrals in Many Matrix-Variate Cases material on a statistical approach to Kiryakova’s multi-index fractional integral and its extension to the real scalar case of second kind integrals as well as extensions of first and second kind integrals to real and complex matrix-variate cases are believed to be new. Matrix differential operators are introduced in Section Fractional Derivatives and, with the help of these operators, fractional derivatives are constructed from the corresponding fractional integrals. These operators are applicable in a large variety of functions. Applicability is shown through identities created from scale transformed gamma random variables. Some concluding remarks are given and some open problems are pointed out in Section Concluding Remarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it