Just-in-time framework for robust soft sensing based on robust variational autoencoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modeling with high-dimensional data subject to abnormal observations have always been a practical interest. In this paper, under the just-in-time learning (JITL) framework, a robust soft sensor modeling approach is developed based on robust Variational Autoencoder (VAE). Unlike the vanilla VAE that extracts features from the given dataset under the Gaussian prior assumption, robust VAE employs Student’s t-distribution as prior distribution to handle abnormal data. Under assumption of the Student’s t-prior, the proposed robust VAE model is capable of describing collected data contaminated with outliers. Once the robust VAE model is trained, each robust feature variable in the latent space can be determined. Subsequently, similarity measure is calculated using robust Kullback-Leibler divergence between two Student’s t-distributions, that is, the distribution of a new data sample and that of each historical data sample. After completing similarity measurement for a query sample, the weights for input-output historical data can be determined. Based on these weighted historical data samples, a robust probabilistic principal component regression (PPCR) is utilized to perform local modeling for prediction. Numerical simulations, including the Tennessee Eastman and Penicillin fermentation benchmark processes, are utilized to validate the proposed JITL-based robust soft sensor modeling method. • Under the JITL framework, a robust soft sensor modeling approach is developed based on robust VAE. • Once the robust VAE model is trained, each robust feature variable in the latent space can be determined. • Numerical simulations and two processes are utilized to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".