Modeling spatiotemporal distribution of yellow rust wheat pathogen using machine learning algorithms: Insights from environmental assessment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The yellow rust pathogen ( Puccinia striiformis Westend) poses a significant threat to wheat production in the world, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its spatiotemporal distribution and the influence of climatic factors. In this study, we employed an ensemble of four prominent machine learning algorithms to assess the impact of various environmental and remote sensing variables on the spread of yellow rust at a national scale. Our analysis incorporated 55 climatic parameters, including monthly temperature, precipitation, solar radiation, and wind speed. The results demonstrated that the RF algorithm yielded robust predictions, with a Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) of 0.916 and True Skill Statistic (TSS) of 0.748. Furthermore, the study identified key influencing variables for wheat disease modeling, such as annual precipitation, temperature seasonality, and isothermality. Projections based on the model indicate a potential decrease in disease spread by 2050 in specific regions. The findings underscore the efficacy of ensemble modeling in predicting the spatiotemporal distribution of yellow rust on a large scale, offering valuable insights for the development of robust agricultural management strategies in the face of evolving climate conditions. • Four ML algorithms were evaluated to predict yellow rust. • Machine learning algorithms identified the most important variables affecting disease epidemics. • Yellow rust on wheat in Iran is increasing and climate change impact needs understanding. • The ensemble model efficiently predicts yellow rust spatiotemporal distribution at a large scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".