MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S1453 Disease Characteristics Associated With Bowel Urgency in Crohn’s Disease: Results From the Phase 3 VIVID-1 Trial

2024· article· en· W4403722243 on OpenAlexaff
Geert D’Haens, Bruce E. Sands, Vipul Jairath, Simon Travis, María Chaparro, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Minhu Chen, Marla C. Dubinsky, Marc Ferrante, Stefan Schreiber, Kim McGinnis, Aisha Vadhariya, Guanglei Yu, Marijana Protić, Richard Moses, Subrata Ghosh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseDiseaseGastroenterologyCrohn diseaseInternal medicineInflammatory bowel disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Data on bowel urgency (BU) in Crohn’s disease (CD) are limited, and associated factors are not well identified. Here we evaluate the association of BU with baseline (BL) disease characteristics in patients with moderately to severely active CD in the randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, treat-through design Phase 3 VIVID-1 trial. Methods: BU was assessed using the average Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (UNRS) (range 0-10) from 7 days prior to the visit. Adults having UNRS ≥3 and no missing values at BL were included. The association of UNRS with Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI), abdominal pain (AP), stool frequency (SF), Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) total score, disease location, count of inflamed intestinal segments, rectal involvement, presence of narrowing, presence of perianal fistulae, number of bowel resections and inflammatory biomarkers were primarily analyzed. Random forest method (RFM) was applied to rank variables by importance associated with BU score at BL. Pearson correlation coefficients (r value) were calculated for continuous BL variables. Results: At BL, 73.4% (782/1065) patients randomized to placebo (n=141), MIRI (n=433), or ustekinumab (n=208) reported UNRS ≥3 (median UNRS 7.0). Among BL disease characteristics, CDAI total score and AP were the top 2 important factors based on RFM and had moderate positive correlations with UNRS (Table 1). Notably, disease characteristics such as SF, SES-CD total score, age at diagnosis, age, fecal calprotectin, and C-reactive protein had weak correlations with UNRS. Also, count of inflamed segments (RFM=0.021; r=0.069), duration of CD (RFM=0.015; r=-0.007), presence of perianal fistula (RFM=0.009; r=0.090), and number of bowel resections (RFM=0.000; r=-0.036) had weak correlations with UNRS. BL corticosteroid (RFM=0.015) and immunomodulator (RFM=0.007) use, disease location (RFM=-0.005), rectal involvement (RFM=0.011), presence of narrowing (RFM=0.007), prior biologic failure (RFM=0.003), and sex (RFM=0.007) had weak correlations with UNRS implied by RFM. Conclusion: Most patients reported BU ≥3 at BL. Moderate positive correlations were observed only between BU, clinical disease severity (CDAI) and AP. Though the association of BU with other disease characteristics such as extent and severity of endoscopic inflammation, rectal involvement, presence of active perianal disease, disease location, previous resection and duration of CD were weak, they potentially interact and contribute together resulting in BU. Table 1. - Correlation of highest ranked baseline variables with UNRS Patient baseline variables Importance value based on random forest Pearson correlation coefficient (r) CDAI Total Score 0.701 0.479 Abdominal pain score 0.398 0.384 Stool frequency score 0.236 0.286 SES-CD total score 0.056 0.118 Age at diagnosis 0.037 -0.018 Age 0.033 -0.022 Faecal calprotectin 0.029 0.031 C-reactive protein 0.028 0.050 Correlation strength defined as: r >0.5=strong, 0.5≥r≥0.3 =moderate, 0.3 >r≥0.1 =weak, r< 0.1=insubstantial.2RFM is used to rank the relative importance of the patient baseline variables to UNRS. The higher values mean more important with a stronger association with UNRS.Abbreviations: CDAI=Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; CI=confidence interval; RFM = random forest method; SES-CD=Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease; UNRS = Urgency Numeric Rating Scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicMicroscopic ColitisFrench-language works237,207