MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S1335 Association of Faecal Calprotectin With Symptomatic, Endoscopic, and Clinical Remission in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis Treated With Mirikizumab

2024· article· en· W4403725041 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisCalprotectinGastroenterologyInternal medicineFaecal calprotectinFecesInflammatory bowel diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Mirikizumab (miri), a p19-directed IL-23 antibody, has been shown to be effective in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) in Phase 3 trials (LUCENT-1 NCT03518086; LUCENT-2 NCT03524092). The relationship between symptomatic, endoscopic, and clinical remission and levels of the inflammatory biomarker faecal calprotectin (fCAL) was studied for miri-treated patients enrolled in the trials. Methods: This post hoc analysis evaluated patients treated with intravenous (IV) miri 300mg every 4 weeks (every 4 weeks) until week (W)12 in induction (n=868) followed by subcutaneous miri (n=365) every 4 weeks up to W52 (miri induction responders at W12 who were rerandomized for the maintenance period) or placebo. The improvement in fCAL at W12 and W52 between miri and placebo were compared using Cochran Mantel Haenszel, adjusting for randomization stratification factors. Missing data were imputed as nonresponse. The relationship between achieving symptomatic, endoscopic, or clinical remission (defined in Table) and fCAL levels at W4, W12 and W52 was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) approaches. Predictability was measured by area under the ROC curve (AUC), and AUC≤0.5 indicates no predictability. Optimal fCAL threshold was obtained based on Youden Index. Results: Greater proportions of miri-treated patients compared to placebo achieved fCAL≤250 ug/g at W4, W12, and W52. A total of 19.0% vs 12.5%, 34.3% vs 20.1%, 50.7% vs 19.3% patients achieved fCAL≤250 ug/g at W4, W12, and W52 miri vs placebo, respectively. Greater proportions of patients achieving symptomatic, endoscopic, and clinical remission reached the predefined threshold of fCAL≤250 ug/g or the optimum fCAL threshold obtained from the ROC (see Table footnote) in this study compared with those not achieving the endpoints (Table 1). W4 fCAL levels had 70.5% predictability for W12 endoscopic remission and 64.9% for clinical remission, but lower predictability for symptomatic remission (59.1%). W12 fCAL levels had 83.0% predictability for W12 endoscopic remission, 78.5% for clinical remission, and 67.4% for symptomatic remission. W52 fCAL levels had higher predictability for W52 endoscopic (76.6%) and clinical remission (72.7%) than for symptomatic remission (62.3%). Conclusion: These results support the use of fCAL as an early predictor of clinical outcomes and as a non-invasive biomarker for predicting clinical outcomes. Table 1. - Faecal Calprotectin Normalization at Week 12 in LUCENT-1 and Week 52 in LUCENT-2 Per Achievement of Efficacy Outcomes Symptomatic Remission Endoscopic Remission Clinical Remission Week 4 Achieving (N=360) Not Achieving (N=406) Achieving (N=290) Not Achieving (N=478) Achieving (N=193) Not Achieving (N=571) fCAL ≤ 250 ug/g 109 (30.3) 79 (19.5)╪ 122 (42.1) 65 (13.6) ╪ 77 (39.9) 110 (19.3)╪ Optimum fCAL threshold 193 (53.6) 159(39.2)╪ 158 (54.5) 106 (22.2)╪ 103 (53.4) 168 (29.4)╪ Week 12 Achieving (N=364) Not Achieving (N=398) Achieving (N=293) Not Achieving (N=472) Achieving (N=199) Not Achieving (N=562) fCAL ≤ 250 ug/g 200 (55.0) 116 (29.2)╪ 216 (73.7) 100 (21.2)╪ 151 (75.9) 164 (29.2)╪ Optimum fCAL threshold 237 (65.1) 149 (37.4)╪ 216 (73.7) 93 (19.7)╪ 151 (75.9) 157 (27.9)╪ Week 52 Achieving (N=230) Not Achieving (N=44) Achieving (N=188) Not Achieving (N=93) Achieving (N=166) Not Achieving (N=107) fCAL ≤ 250 ug/g 161 (70.0) 22 (50.0)* 151 (80.3) 38 (40.9)╪ 133 (80.1) 49 (45.8)╪ Optimum fCAL threshold 161 (70.0) 21 (47.7)* 134 (71.3) 24 (25.8)╪ 129 (77.7) 42 (39.3)╪ Abbreviations: ES=Endoscopic Subscore; fCAL=Fecal Calprotectin; RB = Rectal Bleeding; SF=Stool Frequency.Note: Data shown as n(%) unless otherwise noted. *P < 0.05 and ╪P < 0.001; P-value is from Fisher's exact test.Symptomatic remission is defined as SF = 0 or SF = 1 with a ≥ 1-point decrease from baseline, and RB = 0. Endoscopic Remission is defined as ES = 0 or 1 (excluding friability). Clinical remission is defined as SF = 0 or SF = 1 with a ≥ 1-point decrease from baseline, RB = 0, and ES = 0 or 1 (excluding friability). Optimal fCAL threshold for symptomatic remission/endoscopic remission/ and clinical remission is at ≤585/≤390/≤415 ug/g at Week 4, ≤365/≤230/≤230 ug/g at Week 12, and ≤230/≤150/≤205 ug/g at Week 52, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it