MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403870935 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.02100-24

Real-time plasmid transmission detection pipeline

2024· article· en· W4403870935 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Natalie Effelsberg, Jörg Rothgänger, Thomas Weniger, Alexander Mellmann, Dag Harmsen

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueensland University of TechnologyPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsPlasmidNanopore sequencingPipeline (software)Computer scienceSoftwarePairwise comparisonBiologyTypingComputational biologyGenomeGeneticsArtificial intelligenceGeneOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The spread of antimicrobial resistance among bacteria by horizontal plasmid transmissions poses a major challenge for clinical microbiology. Here, we evaluate a new real-time plasmid transmission detection pipeline implemented in the SeqSphere + (Ridom GmbH, Münster, Germany) software. Within the pipeline, a local Mash plasmid database is created, and Mash searches with a distance threshold of 0.001 are used to trigger plasmid transmission early warning alerts (EWAs). Clonal transmissions are detected using core-genome multi-locus sequence typing allelic differences. The tools MOB-suite, NCBI AMRFinderPlus, CGE MobileElementFinder, pyGenomeViz, and MUMmer, integrated in SeqSphere+, are used to characterize plasmids and for visual pairwise plasmid comparisons, respectively. We evaluated the pipeline using published hybrid assemblies (Oxford Nanopore Technology/Illumina) of a surveillance and outbreak data set with plasmid transmissions. To emulate prospective usage, samples were imported in chronological order of sampling date. Different combinations of the user-adjustable parameters sketch size (1,000 vs 10,000) and plasmid size correction were tested, and discrepancies between resulting clusters were analyzed with Quast. When using a sketch size of 1,000 with size correction turned on, the SeqSphere + pipeline agreed with the published data and produced the same clonal and carbapenemase-carrying plasmid clusters. EWAs were in the correct chronological order. In summary, the developed pipeline presented here is suitable for integration into clinical microbiology settings with limited bioinformatics knowledge due to its automated analyses and alert system, which are combined with the GUI-based SeqSphere + platform. Thus, with its integrated sample database, (near) real-time plasmid transmission detection is within reach in bacterial routine-diagnostic settings when long-read sequencing is employed. IMPORTANCE Plasmid-mediated spread of antimicrobial resistance is a major challenge for clinical microbiology, and monitoring of potential plasmid transmissions is essential to combat further dissemination. Whole-genome sequencing is often used to surveil nosocomial transmissions but usually limited to the detection of clonal transmissions (based on chromosomal markers). Recent advances in long-read sequencing technologies enable full reconstruction of plasmids and the detection of very similar plasmids, but so far, easy-to-use bioinformatic tools for this purpose have been missing. Here, we present an evaluation of an innovative real-time plasmid transmission detection pipeline. It is integrated into the GUI-based SeqSphere + software, which already offers core-genome multi-locus sequence typing-based pathogen outbreak detection. It requires very limited bioinformatics knowledge, and its database, automated analyses, and alert system make it well suited for prospective clinical application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207