The impact of supply chain finance on financial constraints of small and medium-sized enterprises and the moderating factors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supply chain finance (SCF) has gained significant popularity and has been extensively implemented in practical applications to facilitate cash flow by involving financial institutions. However, there are very few empirical studies on SCF. This study examines whether and how much SCF can alleviate financial constraints of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Furthermore, we examine the impact of information asymmetry, financial development depth, and economic policy uncertainty on the effectiveness of SCF. These three moderating factors correspond to the influence of firms, local financial development, and national government on SCF effectiveness, respectively. The empirical analysis shows that SCF can alleviate SMEs’ financial constraints significantly, and this effect is more pronounced for firms with higher information disclosure quality and located in financially developed areas. Our findings have important implications for firms and authorities, such as understanding the dynamics of SCF and developing appropriate measures and frameworks to promote the broad adoption and effective utilization of SCF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it