MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403896510 · doi:10.1111/cgf.15225

Ray Tracing Animated Displaced Micro‐Meshes

2024· article· en· W4403896510 on OpenAlexaff
Holger Gruen, Carsten Benthin, Andrew Kensler, Joshua Barczak, David McAllister

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Graphics Forum · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolygon meshComputer graphics (images)Computer scienceRay tracing (physics)TracingAnimationProgramming languageOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a new method that allows efficient ray tracing of virtually artefact‐free animated displaced micro‐meshes (DMMs) [MMT23] and preserves their low memory footprint and low BVH build and update cost. DMMs allow for compact representation of micro‐triangle geometry through hierarchical encoding of displacements. Displacements are computed with respect to a coarse base mesh and are used to displace new vertices introduced during 1 : 4 subdivision of the base mesh. Applying non‐rigid transformation to the base mesh can result in silhouette and normal artefacts (see Figure 1) during animation. We propose an approach which prevents these artefacts by interpolating transformation matrices before applying them to the DMM representation. Our interpolation‐based algorithm does not change DMM data structures and it allows for efficient bounding of animated micro‐triangle geometry which is essential for fast tessellation‐free ray tracing of animated DMMs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Graphics ForumSame topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207