MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403906061 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v4i1.672

Design and Build an IoT-Based Shoe Dryer Monitoring and Control System

2024· article· en· W4403906061 on OpenAlexaff
Apriandi Alfa Reza Saragih, Akim Manaor Hara Pardede, Magdalena Simanjuntak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Sensor Networks and IoT
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsMonitoring and controlComputer scienceControl (management)Systems engineeringControl engineeringProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceEmbedded systemArchitectural engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wet shoes that are not dried immediately can lead to the growth of bacteria and fungi that can potentially damage the shoes and cause health problems in the user. Therefore, an effective and efficient shoe dryer is needed. This research aims to design and develop a monitoring and control system for shoe dryers based on the Internet of Things (IoT) that can be operated remotely through a web-based application or mobile device. The system consists of several main components, namely humidity and temperature sensors, microcontrollers, wireless communication modules, and heating elements. Humidity and temperature sensors are used to detect the condition of the shoe and the surrounding environment, while the microcontroller is in charge of processing the data and regulating the operation of the heating element as needed. With the wireless communication module, users can monitor and control the drying process in real-time through an application connected to the internet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA)Same topicWireless Sensor Networks and IoTFrench-language works237,207