MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403908483 · doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101390

High-resolution mapping of Blueberry scorch virus incidence using RGB and multispectral UAV images and deep learning

2024· article· en· W4403908483 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Jamali, Bing Lu, Rishi R. Burlakoti, Siva Sabaratnam, Margaret Schmidt, C. Teasdale, Eric M. Gerbrandt, Jonathon McIntyre, David J. McCaffrey

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing Applications Society and Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMira Geoscience (Canada)British Columbia Blueberry CouncilAbbotsford Veterinary ClinicGovernment of British ColumbiaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultispectral imageRGB color modelArtificial intelligenceRemote sensingCartographyDeep learningComputer scienceComputer visionIncidence (geometry)GeographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blueberry scorch caused by Blueberry scorch virus (BlScV) is a destructive disease, which can result in substantial yield decline and pose a significant threat to the viability of well-established highbush blueberry fields in North America and other regions. Early detection of the disease in the field, removal of infected bushes, and control of its spread via aphids to other fields or regions are critical for managing this disease. Visual assessment of Blueberry scorch symptoms is the predominant method for identifying and estimating the disease, which, however, is labour-intensive, tedious, and inefficient. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based imaging is a powerful remote sensing tool for crop monitoring with several advantages, such as flexibility to acquire images of different pixel sizes, short revisit time intervals, reduced susceptibility to cloud interference, and flexibility to equip with different sensors. This study aims to collect UAV images to detect and map BlScV-infected blueberry plants using a cutting-edge deep learning model. Images of different pixel sizes acquired by an RGB sensor, and a multispectral sensor were compared to evaluate their detection accuracies. To ensure comprehensive information dependency extraction at close-, mid-, and long-ranges, the deep learning techniques developed in this study incorporate various computer vision-based mechanisms, such as Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and Self-Attention (SA) modules. Through these innovations, the deep learning algorithm, called InceptionLSA, obtained the highest average accuracy of 76.33% and 70.00% at a 20 cm pixel size of the multispectral and RGB images, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote Sensing Applications Society and EnvironmentSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207