MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403977181 · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3485452

Radio Frequency Fingerprinting for WiFi Devices Using Oscillator Drifts

2024· article· en· W4403977181 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersResearch and Development
KeywordsRadio frequencyComputer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radio frequency fingerprint (RFF) identification is a promising technique that exploits hardware impairment-induced features to achieve specific device identification. Among RFF features, carrier frequency offset (CFO) as a hotspot feature has received widespread attention. Since CFO is time-variant, existing research suggests compensating for its drift; however, this article emphasizes using the drift of CFO. Correspondingly, a novel RFF feature, named cyclic similarity (cyc-similarity), is proposed to depict the oscillator drift. Simply combining the cyc-similarity feature with a K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier, the system can achieve superior temporal and receiver generalization performance. On a public dataset of WiFi devices, the proposed method outperforms the existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it