MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403990420 · doi:10.5376/gab.2024.15.0024

Research Progress in Genome Sequencing and Functional Gene Mining of Cannabis

2024· article· en· W4403990420 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shanyu Chen, Huijuan Tang, Si Jie, Wenjun Wang, Li‐Juan Tang, Guo‐Rui Ruan

Bibliographic record

VenueGenomics and Applied Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicTransgenic Plants and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersZhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences
KeywordsCannabisGenomeComputational biologyGeneBiologyGeneticsDNA sequencingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary goal of this study is to advance the understanding of the Cannabis sativa genome and to identify functional genes that contribute to its medicinal, industrial, and agricultural applications. Our comprehensive analysis revealed several key findings. Current Cannabis genome assemblies are incomplete, with significant portions missing or unmapped, which hampers accurate gene annotation. Recent advancements in genomics have identified four genes significantly associated with lifetime cannabis use: NCAM1, CADM2, SCOC, and KCNT2, which are linked to various phenotypes such as substance use and body mass index. Additionally, a high-quality reference genome for wild Cannabis sativa has been developed, providing valuable genetic resources for future research. In silico approaches have been proposed for genome editing, targeting genes involved in cannabinoid biosynthesis, which could lead to novel applications in agriculture and medicine. Furthermore, virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) methods have been successfully applied to study gene functions in cannabis, demonstrating the potential for functional gene studies. The findings underscore the importance of coordinated efforts to complete and refine Cannabis genome assemblies. The identification of key genes and the development of advanced genomics tools hold significant promise for the genetic improvement of cannabis. These advancements could lead to enhanced medicinal and industrial applications, ultimately benefiting various sectors including agriculture, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomics and Applied BiologySame topicTransgenic Plants and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207