Forecasting short-term subway passenger flow using Wi-Fi data: comparative analysis of advanced time-series methods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurately monitoring passenger demand fluctuations is crucial for streamlined operations of subway systems and informed decision-making. This study presents a detailed Time Series Analysis of the Toronto subway system using Wi-Fi data connection from devices as a predictor of passenger volume. Various time series models were tested for short-term forecasting, including Linear Regression, Exponential Smoothing, ARIMA, Random Forest, N-BEATS, and T-GCN. An end-to-end modeling implementation process was carried out, and the performance of each model was evaluated. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of short-term prediction models for univariate time series at the system level and discuss deployment challenges. While conventional time series models are fast to implement and interpretable, they require a more in-depth data exploration phase for validation, making scaling at the system level difficult. Additionally, maintenance is more challenging with conventional models, and their exploratory analysis phases need to be repeated when the models degrade over time. Prediction difficulty varied across each subway station, indicating the need for a more thorough calibration or hybrid approach, especially for transfer stations. Despite the different uses and qualities of each model in our scenario, Random Forest and Exponential Smoothing emerged as the best performers and could be a satisfactory option for robust demand forecasting at the system level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it