MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404056978 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3486028

Secure and Efficient Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks in Horizontal and Vertical Data Partitioning

2024· article· en· W4404056978 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFederated learningComputer scienceComputer securityHorizontal and verticalDistributed computingGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In distributed systems, data may partially overlap in sample and feature spaces, that is, horizontal and vertical data partitioning. By combining horizontal and vertical federated learning (FL), hybrid FL emerges as a promising solution to simultaneously deal with data overlapping in both sample and feature spaces. Due to its decentralized nature, hybrid FL is vulnerable to model poisoning attacks, where malicious devices corrupt the global model by sending crafted model updates to the server. Existing work usually analyzes the statistical characteristics of all updates to resist model poisoning attacks. However, training local models in hybrid FL requires additional communication and computation steps, increasing the detection cost. In addition, due to data diversity in hybrid FL, solutions based on the assumption that malicious models are distinct from honest models may incorrectly classify honest ones as malicious, resulting in low accuracy. To this end, we propose a secure and efficient hybrid FL against model poisoning attacks. Specifically, we first identify two attacks to define how attackers manipulate local models in a harmful yet covert way. Then, we analyze the execution time and energy consumption in hybrid FL. Based on the analysis, we formulate an optimization problem to minimize training costs while guaranteeing accuracy considering the effect of attacks. To solve the formulated problem, we transform it into a Markov decision process and model it as a multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL) problem. Then, we propose a malicious device detection (MDD) method based on MARL to select honest devices to participate in training and improve efficiency. In addition, we propose an alternative poisoned model detection (PMD) method considering model change consistency. This method aims to prevent poisoned models from being used in the model aggregation. Experimental results validate that under the random local model poisoning attack, the proposed MDD method can save over 50% training costs while guaranteeing accuracy. When facing the advanced adaptive local model poisoning (ALMP) attack, utilizing both the proposed MDD and PMD methods achieves the desired accuracy while reducing execution time and energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it