MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404057002 · doi:10.1109/jproc.2024.3484529

Wireless 6G Connectivity for Massive Number of Devices and Critical Services

2024· article· en· W4404057002 on OpenAlexafffund
Anders E. Kalør, Giuseppe Durisi, Sinem Çöleri, Stefan Parkvall, Wei Yu, Andreas Mueller, Petar Popovski

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the IEEE · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaStiftelsen för Strategisk ForskningCanada Research ChairsVetenskapsrådetFord Otomotiv SanayiNational Research Foundation
KeywordsWirelessComputer scienceWireless networkComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compared to the generations up to 4G, whose main focus was on broadband and coverage aspects, 5G has expanded the scope of wireless cellular systems toward embracing two new types of connectivity: massive machine-type communications (mMTCs) and ultrareliable low-latency communications (URLLCs). This article discusses the possible evolution of these two types of connectivity within the umbrella of 6G wireless systems. This article consists of three parts. The first part deals with the connectivity for a massive number of devices. While mMTC research in 5G predominantly focuses on the problem of uncoordinated access in the uplink for a large number of devices, the traffic patterns in 6G may become more symmetric, leading to closed-loop massive connectivity. One of the drivers for this type of traffic pattern is distributed/decentralized learning and inference. The second part of this article discusses the evolution of wireless connectivity for critical services. While latency and reliability are tightly coupled in 5G, 6G will support a variety of safety-critical control applications with different types of timing requirements, as evidenced by the emergence of metrics related to information freshness and information value. In addition, ensuring ultrahigh reliability for safety-critical control applications requires modeling and estimation of the tail statistics of the wireless channel, queue length, and delay. The fulfillment of these stringent requirements calls for the development of novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques, incorporating optimization theory, explainable AI (XAI), generative AI, and digital twins (DTs). The third part analyzes the coexistence of massive connectivity and critical services. Specifically, we consider scenarios in which a massive number of devices need to support traffic patterns of mixed criticality. This is followed by a discussion about the management of wireless resources shared by services with different criticality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the IEEESame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207