MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404103071 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3492913

LiDAR-Based Multisensor Fusion With 3-D Digital Maps for High-Precision Positioning

2024· article· en· W4404103071 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaMicrosemi (Canada)Queen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLidarComputer scienceSensor fusionRemote sensingFusionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceReal-time computingGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate and reliable positioning is essential for Vehicular Internet of Things (IoT) applications, such as autonomous and connected vehicles, to ensure their effective and safe operation. This calls for innovative methods that leverage various sensors and systems to fulfill such demands across diverse environmental and operational conditions. This article presents a multisensor positioning and navigation system that leverages cost-effective commercial-grade sensors for global navigation satellite system (GNSS)-challenging urban and indoor environments. The system integrates the vehicle’s onboard motion sensors (OBMSs) measurements with 3-D point clouds from light detection and ranging (LiDAR) registered to high-accuracy 3-D digital maps for sustained decimeter-level positioning accuracy. Key contributions include accurate LiDAR scan georeferencing with motion compensation, efficient map-to-map registration, and an effective decentralized fusion. Road test experiments on a professional land vehicle setup equipped with a multisensory navigation instrument were performed in downtown and covered parking garage environments with accurate 3-D geodatabase (GDB) available. Results from several road test trajectories demonstrate robust high-precision positioning performance with an average root mean-square error of 20 cm horizontally and 13 cm vertically, as well as position errors of less than 50 cm for 97% of the time and less than 30 cm for 90.7% of the time. The proposed system is a practical option for the positioning and navigation of self-driving cars and has the potential for cooperative mapping and updating 3-D city maps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it