MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404290299 · doi:10.2147/ppa.s495254

Pharmacovigilance in Action: Utilizing VigiBase Data to Improve Clozapine Safety

2024· review· en· W4404290299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePatient Preference and Adherence · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePharmacovigilancePharmacologyClozapineDrugSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Psychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Clozapine is an antipsychotic which was approved in 1989 for treatment-resistant schizophrenia in the United States (US). There were few randomized trials before its approval and potentially lethal clozapine adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as agranulocytosis and myocarditis were identified by pharmacovigilance. VigiBase, the WHO global database, is a cornerstone of international pharmacovigilance efforts for ADR identification during post-marketing surveillance. This systematic review of the literature explores additional contributions to the knowledge of clozapine ADRs from recent VigiBase studies. Methods: Using the terms ”clozapine AND VigiBase” we conducted an article search in PubMed on September 5, 2024. Of the 29 articles, 11 were excluded and 18 described in the Results section. Results: All clozapine ADRs were described in two VigiBase studies. One on pregnancy indicated no increased risk with clozapine compared with other antipsychotics; the other reported 191,557 clozapine ADRs, including 22,956 fatal outcomes through January 15, 2023, and paid attention to the reporting style of the top 4 reporting countries (the US, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia). Infections were described in three VigiBase studies where clozapine treatment was associated with infections, respiratory aspiration, and pneumonia. Rapid titration can lead to localized clozapine-induced inflammations including myocarditis, pericarditis or pancreatitis, or generalized inflammations such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. Clozapine-induced inflammation was described in four VigiBase studies, two focused on all ages (myocarditis and DRESS) and two on youth (myocarditis and another on pericarditis and pancreatitis). Other specific ADRs were described in nine VigiBase studies (hematological malignancies, rhabdomyolysis, sialorrhea, seizures, diabetes mellitus, drug-induced parkinsonism, withdrawal symptoms, and suicidal behaviors). Conclusion: The spectrum of respiratory aspiration – aspiration pneumonia – pneumonia and other infections are significant causes of fatal outcomes in clozapine-treated patients. Clozapine had anti-suicidal effects versus other antipsychotics across all VigiBase labels of suicidal behavior. Plain Language Summary: Why was the review done? Marketers develop a package insert after a medical drug is licensed for use in each country. The package insert describes the known benefits and risks of the drug at the time it was licensed. After licensing, post-marketing studies are continued to look for possible undetected adverse drug reactions; this process is called pharmacovigilance. These pharmacovigilance studies should be done by the drug agencies in all countries. These national agencies send their reports to the international pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase. VigiBase is managed by the World Health Organization and is located in Uppsala, Sweden. Clozapine is a second-generation antipsychotic medication that was licensed in 1989 in the United States for treatment-resistant schizophrenia and then approved by other countries. In 1989 there was major concern about clozapine causing agranulocytosis (loss of white blood cells), so a hematological monitoring system was required in the United States. Later, myocarditis was associated with clozapine in pharmacovigilance studies. What did the authors do? They systematically reviewed VigiBase studies on clozapine adverse drug reactions and identified 18 studies that described clozapine adverse drug reactions in detail. What do these results mean? These VigiBase studies indicate that the respiratory aspiration – aspiration pneumonia – pneumonia spectrum, along with other infections, are significant causes of fatal outcomes in clozapine-treated patients, but this is not mentioned in any clozapine package insert. On the positive side, VigiBase data confirms other literature that clozapine may have specific anti-suicidal effects not present in other antipsychotics. Keywords: clozapine/adverse effects, clozapine/therapeutic use, clozapine/toxicity, drug labeling, product surveillance, postmarketing, schizophrenia

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.390
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.080 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it