MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404325586 · doi:10.1201/9781003496724-26

Smart and sustainable threat intelligence

2024· book-chapter· en· W4404325586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Duaa Shoukat, Muhammad Taimoor Khan, Syed Muhammad Sajjad, Adnan Akhunzada

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntelligence, Security, War Strategy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack is known to be the most dangerous attack in cyber-threats which is identically collective in the world of today&s;s interconnected networks, as it mainly disrupts and makes vital services unavailable. Hackers are skilled in using multi- classification DDoS attacks to evade the detection for exploitation of the targeted networks. A proactive and efficient detection mechanism is much needed to secure the networks from multiclass DDoS attacks. However, implementing DDoS detection schemes is very difficult due to the factors such as cost, complexities, and inflexibility. Most of the work has been done to tackle these attacks; still, the open question is to find out an efficient, smart and sustainable model amongst available choices. Therefore, in this research, the author proposes a novel, lightweight Cuda- powered Deep Neural Network Long Short-Term Memory (Cu-DNNLSTM) enabled smart and sustainable threat intelligence system for large and distributed enterprise networks and is simply termed as Multiclass DDoS Detection mechanism (MDDM). The proposed approach is implemented using the current state of the art Canadian Institute of Cybersecurity (CIC)-DDoS2019 dataset that is publicly available and has been thoroughly evaluated. The preliminary results achieves 99.60% detection accuracy with a relatively low ratio of False Positives (FP) (i.e., 0.0003). Additionally, the proposed approach has also been compared with two other DL models to show the promising performance of the proposed approach. Finally, the proposed approach is highly scalable, cost effective, flexible and sustainable to be customized for any emerging computational and communication paradigm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntelligence, Security, War StrategyFrench-language works237,207