Diagnosa Penyakit Kanker Prostat menggunakan Metode Certainty Factor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid development of information technology affects the way people access information, including in the health sector. Prostate cancer, as one of the most significant types of cancer in men, is often detected late due to lack of information and limited costs. To overcome this problem, a system is needed that is able to diagnose prostate cancer quickly, precisely, and accurately. This study aims to develop a web-based expert system using the Certainty Factor (CF) method to diagnose prostate cancer based on the symptoms that appear. The CF method was chosen because of its ability to determine the level of confidence in the facts or rules used in the diagnosis. This study uses data on symptoms and types of prostate cancer. The results of the study can help the public in recognizing prostate cancer symptoms early, with a high level of accuracy in diagnosis. This study is expected to make it easier for patients to make an early diagnosis and accelerate the treatment of prostate cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it