Penerapan Metode Naïve Bayes untuk Memprediksi Tingkat Kesehatan Mental Siswa Menjelang Akhir Masa Sekolah
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mental health is a state of well-being in which a person is aware of his or her abilities, can cope with normal life stresses, can work productively and contribute to his or her community. Mental health encompasses emotional, psychological and social well-being, and affects how a person thinks, feels and acts. It also determines how a person handles stress, relates to others and makes decisions. Prediction methods that can identify the level of mental health of students are important as a preventive measure. One promising method in this regard is the Naïve Bayes Method. This method has the advantage of being able to solve classification problems on complex datasets, such as student mental health data involving many independent variables. An expert system is a system that attempts to adopt human knowledge into computers so that computers can solve problems as is usually done by experts. The purpose of this study was to find out how to predict the level of mental health of students towards the end of school using the Naïve Bayes method. The results of this study are that the prediction of the level of mental health of students towards the end of school using the Naïve Bayes method can be used and the system created works well, without having to consult a doctor or psychologist.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it