Safe reinforcement learning-based control using deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm and slime mould algorithm with experimental tower crane system validation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Safe Reinforcement Learning (RL) as Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient is used. • Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) is combined with metaheuristic SMA. • The approach mitigates the drawbacks of DDPG-based safe RL optimal control. • SMA initializes the parameters of the neural network-based controller. • State safety constraints are incorporated into the search process of SMA. This paper presents a novel optimal control approach resulting from the combination between the safe Reinforcement Learning (RL) framework represented by a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) algorithm and a Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA) as a representative nature-inspired optimization algorithm. The main drawbacks of the traditional DDPG-based safe RL optimal control approach are the possible instability of the control system caused by randomly generated initial values of the controller parameters and the lack of state safety guarantees in the first iterations of the learning process due to (i) and (ii): (i) the safety constraints are considered only in the DDPG-based training process of the controller, which is usually implemented as a neural network (NN); (ii) the initial values of the weights and the biases of the NN-based controller are initialized with randomly generated values. The proposed approach mitigates these drawbacks by initializing the parameters of the NN-based controller using SMA. The fitness function of the SMA-based initialization process is designed to incorporate state safety constraints into the search process, resulting in an initial NN-based controller with embedded state safety constraints. The proposed approach is compared to the classical one using real-time experimental results and performance indices popular for optimal reference tracking control problems and based on a state safety score.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".