MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

3D bioprinting of thick core–shell vascularized scaffolds for potential tissue engineering applications

2024· article· en· W4404357012 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Polymer Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTissue engineeringMaterials scienceShell (structure)Core (optical fiber)3D bioprintingScaffoldBiomedical engineeringNanotechnologyComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Scaffolds with embedded hollow channels were successfully 3D bioprinted. • Cells showed high survival rates after 3D bioprinting. • Endothelial cells formed lumen over time in the scaffolds. • Mechanical properties of the scaffolds were similar to soft tissues. The promise of tissue engineering in developing functional, living, 3D thick structures has been limited due to the constraints of nutrient and oxygen delivery through diffusion. Although advancements in additive manufacturing approaches have enhanced the fidelity and complexity of 3D (bio)printed constructs, the vascularization of such scaffolds is less investigated. Here, we have leveraged extrusion-based 3D bioprnting of core/shell constructs to develop millimeter-thick scaffolds with embedded microvasculature for potential soft tissue repair. Composites of methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) and gelatin have been used for this purpose. A systematic approach was used to investigate the effect of parameters, such as material and photoinitiator concentrations, and photocuring time, on the properties of constructs. Results have shown the structures have Young’s modulus close to the soft tissues. 3D bioprinting parameters were optimized so that the printing and photo crosslinking procedures did not negatively affect the cell viability. It was also observed that a continuous hollow inner core could be successfully printed within the scaffolds, which upon incorporation of endothelial cells during the 3D bioprinting process, could form micro-vessels embedded in the constructs. Together, our results demonstrate the significant potential of the proposed approach for developing thick vascularized tissue-engineered scaffolds suitable for soft tissue engineering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it