Multi-venue location optimization with overlapping audience reach areas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) is currently facing recruitment challenges. Similar to target market advertising in other industries, military recruitment can be optimized by aiming recruitment efforts at populations with high enrolment success potential. Using historical data, geographical regions with high potential for recruitment can be identified. This can be used to optimize the reach of recruitment events to high potential geographical regions. This paper looks at applications of facility location optimization in recruitment attraction event planning activities where there are intersections in regions each venue can attract audiences from (venue reach areas), and the probability that the events will attract targeted audience varies by geographical location. This study models the problem as a mixed integer nonlinear problem (MINLP) and provides an exact solution method. This is followed by a case study applying the model to the CAF’s recruitment events for a sample geographical area of the Canadian National Capital Region (NCR).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it