A model for scheduling the resource deployment in a multi-stage ramp-up production system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rapid and continuous changes in customer product requirements affect demand, requiring the supply chain to be more responsive. A new product ramp-up is integral to responsiveness, where it is paramount to implement it successfully and manage it effectively. A smooth ramp-up process minimises problems and delays, leading to lower costs and higher profitability. This study develops and analyses a model that describes a multi-stage ramp-up production system to identify the most cost-effective policy for controlling multiple ramp-ups. We propose a search-based optimisation approach to solve the problem. Through numerical analyses, we develop a decision framework to classify the patterns of resource deployment and planning, aiming to make the ramp-up process efficient and responsive to increasing demand. Additionally, we conduct sensitivity analyses to examine how variations in input parameters affect system behaviour. Our findings offer managerial implications and insights based on the numerical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it