Characterising vibration patterns of winter jujube trees to optimise automated fruit harvesting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding jujube tree dynamic characteristics is crucial for the design and invention of a catch-and-shake machine for fruit harvesting. Currently, the study of vibration characteristics based on the finite element method is the mainstream method for different types of fruit trees. However, limited by the lack of an accurate 3D tree model, there are still gaps between existing simulation analysis and actual tests to explore vibration characteristics. Specifically, the vibration mechanism of winter jujube trees is still unclear in jujube orchards. To address the issue, a multi-view 3D reconstruction technique is employed to acquire precise 3D tree models for simulation analysis. The obtained results from experiments indicate that the determination coefficient R 2 of the trunks and branches diameter are 0.96 and 0.91 between reconstructed and actual measurement results. Subsequently, material properties of jujube tree are measured to conduct model analysis and harmonic response analysis to find the optimal frequency range (10–20 Hz) in which a considerable vibration response can be obtained at low vibration energies. Moreover, transient analysis and test experiments are conducted to explore the energy transfer properties under different vibration frequency. Results showed that the acceleration response gradually increased from the bottom to the top of the branch on most branches at non-resonant frequencies. The proposed method can provide informative insights on the design of high-efficiency and low-energy jujube catch-and-shake harvesters. • Accurate 3D models for jujube trees are reconstructed using SfM. • Vibration transfer characteristics are explored using transient analysis. • The optimal harvesting parameters are determined by the finite element method. • The field experiments validate the reliability of the simulation results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".