Multi Frame Obscene Video Detection With ViT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the development of the Internet, people are surrounded by various types of information daily, including obscene videos. The quantity of such videos is increasing daily, making the detection and filtering of this information a crucial step in preventing its spread. However, a significant challenge remains in detecting obscene information in obscure scenarios, like indecent behavior occurring while wearing normal clothing, causing significant negative impacts, such as harmful influence on children. To address this issue, an innovative multi frame obscene video detection base on ViT is proposed by this manuscript per the authors, aiming to automatically detect and filter obscene content in videos. Extensive experiments conducted on the public NPDI dataset demonstrate that this method achieves better results than existing state-of-the-art methods, achieving 96.2%. Additionally, it achieves satisfactory classification accuracy on a dataset of obscure obscene videos.This provides a powerful tool for future video censorship and protects minors and the general public.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it