MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404461581 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/2415_48

Study: Selbaie Mine, Quebec, Canada

2024· article· en· W4404461581 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMine closure · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMining engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Selbaie Mine site (‘the Site’) located in northern Quebec, Canada, is a former copper-zinc mine that operated between 1983 and 2004; rehabilitation works began in 2000 and were largely completed by 2006. A closure plan for the site was submitted to regulatory authorities in 1996 and updated in 2003. Two primary domains at the Site include a tailings management area (TMA) and waste rock dump (WRD), with most of the waste material being net acid generating. The 1996 Closure Plan included the following for the two primary domains: Waste rock piles (approximately 34 million tonnes at the end of mining) will continue to generate acid leachate for decades and even centuries, with or without a soil cover. The most cost-effective way to control this problem is to capture and treat the acid leaching products from the waste rock piles on a -term basis. The TMA contains a very large amount of sulphur and metals (40 million tonnes of tailings after operations), of which most remain saturated in the long-term and are therefore not prone to leaching acid or metal products. However, it is neither practical nor cost-effective to prevent the formation of local unsaturated tailings areas and unsaturated reactive waste rock areas on the perimeters of the dams that will be subject to acidic and metal product leaching. Therefore, the capture and treatment of acid leaching products from the tailings pond is necessary in the long-term. Ultimately closure covers were constructed over the TMA and WRD using a nominal 1 m thick soil cover comprised of local silty-sand till material followed by seeding the cover surfaces with a mixture of native grasses and legumes. The purpose of the TMA cover was to maintain saturated tailings to the extent practicable, while the cover on the WRD was intended to limit net percolation of meteoric water through water-shedding and store-and-release processes. Overall, the Site is underperforming due to the design and post-closure performance of the WRD and there is risk that additional desaturation of the TMA could result in acidic seepage from the TMA. Acidic seepage from the TMA would require additional effort and cost related to water treatment, maintenance, and surveillance activities at the Site. This paper describes the operation and performance of the Site with a focus on the TMA and WRD. The case study reinforces the need to use benchmarking, cover trials, and the fact that mine closure needs to start early and be progressive to avoid relatively high post-closure maintenance requirements and costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it