A Hierarchical Surrogate-Assisted Differential Evolution With Core Space Localization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms (SAEAs) are extensively used to tackle expensive optimization problems (EOPs). The integration of surrogate-based global and local search is a prevalent hierarchical SAEA framework, which can effectively balance exploration and exploitation capabilities. However, it still faces challenges when tackling high-dimensional EOPs (HEOPs) owing to the curse of dimensionality. In this article, we propose a hierarchical surrogate-assisted differential evolution with core space localization (HSADE-CS) to solve HEOPs. Its contributions are listed as follows: 1) a top-promising sampling strategy is introduced in the global search to mitigate the challenges posed by the uncertainty in the performance of the surrogate model; 2) a core space localization (CSL) method is proposed to identify a high-potential space within the local promising region, enhancing the effectiveness of local search; and 3) a fitness-independent adaptive parameter control method based on the Minkowski distance is developed within the differential evolution (DE) optimizer to improve the performance of surrogate model-driven local search. The performance of HSADE-CS has been validated on numerous benchmark problems from the commonly used expensive optimization benchmark suite, as well as the CEC2014 and CEC2017 benchmark suites, with problem dimensions up to 500. It has also been tested on a real-world problem, i.e., circular antenna array design optimization. Experimental results demonstrate that HSADE-CS is highly competitive compared to the state-of-the-art SAEAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it