MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404479890 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2024.3501956

Dynamic Offloading in Mobile Edge Computing With Traffic-Aware Network Slicing and Adaptive TD3 Strategy

2024· article· en· W4404479890 on OpenAlexaff
Amin Mohajer, Javad Hajipour, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersScience and Engineering Research Council
KeywordsComputer scienceMobile edge computingComputer networkSlicingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDistributed computingServerTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network slicing and computation offloading play a pivotal role in enabling edge service providers to handle dynamic service demands effectively. However, traffic fluctuations and resource diversity pose significant challenges, often constrained by static configurations lacking flexibility. To overcome these limitations, this letter presents FlexSlice, a dynamic offloading framework designed to optimize resource allocation in mobile edge networks. Our approach leverages a sparse multi-head graph attention mechanism for precise traffic prediction, capturing complex spatio-temporal dependencies to enhance network slicing decisions. Additionally, we present an adaptive offloading strategy based on the twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm, which incorporates twin critics and prioritized experience replay to improve decision-making under dynamic conditions. Simulation results confirm FlexSlice’s outstanding performance and adaptability in diverse operational scenarios, achieving higher profits and reliable quality of service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207