MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404554142 · doi:10.33137/utjph.v5i1.44133

Practical Implementation of Advanced Causal Inference Method: Development of an R Package for Bayesian Marginal Structural Models with Time-Varying Treatment

2024· article· en· W4404554142 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Xiao, Kuan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Journal of Public Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComputational and Text Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCausal inferenceMarginal structural modelComputer scienceR packageInferenceBayesian probabilityBayesian inferenceStatistical inferenceEconometricsMachine learningArtificial intelligenceData miningStatisticsMathematicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Observational studies offer a viable, efficient, and low-cost design to readily gather evidence on exposure effects. Although more practical, the exposure mechanism is non-randomized and causal inference methods are required to draw causal conclusions. Objectives: Bayesian approaches to causal inference have unique estimation features that are useful in many settings; however, there is a lack of open-access software packages to carry out these analyses. Our project seeks to address this gap by developing a user-friendly R package named “bayesmsm” for the implementation of the Bayesian Marginal Structural Models for longitudinal observational data with extensions to handle right-censoring which is common for longitudinal health data. This R package provides an elegant approach to conduct Bayesian causal inference with time-varying exposure and confounding. Methods: We use simulated datasets to assess the performance of the package and to illustrate its use. This package first implements Bayesian parametric treatment assignment weight estimation through Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) computation. It then uses Bayesian non-parametric bootstrap to maximize the utility function with respect to the causal effect. The bootstrap calculation process was optimized for performance through parallel computing. The package has additional features, including handling right-censored data and generating analysis summaries and visualizations. Results: Using simulated datasets with and without right-censoring, the subject-specific treatment assignment weights were estimated using the package's weight estimation functions. The Bayesian posterior bootstrap results were further visualized by functions built within this package. Conclusions: The “bayesmsm” package provides a reliable tool to implement complex Bayesian Marginal Structural Model analysis. Future work will focus on extending this package to handle time-to-event data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.107
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.107
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Journal of Public HealthSame topicComputational and Text Analysis MethodsFrench-language works237,207