MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhanced Efficiency in Electric Vehicle Operation: Easy Dynamic Direct Voltage MTPA Control without Current Sensing for Interior PMSMs

2024· article· en· W4404563880 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamad Alzayed, Hicham Chaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric vehicleVoltageControl (management)Current (fluid)Direct currentControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceAutomotive engineeringControl systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transportation sector is widely acknowledged for contributing the largest share of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study presents a strategy aimed at enhancing energy efficiency in electric vehicles by employing an easy dynamic direct voltage method without current sensing for MTPA speed control of interior PMSMs. The approach involves following the MTPA angle using a distinctive voltage magnitude, eliminating the need for current sensing at any speed in electric vehicles. This results in minimized current and power consumption, ultimately leading to heightened energy efficiency. The accomplishment of these objectives is facilitated by incorporating the motor’s dynamic model, which enhances controller responsiveness, especially during dynamics. The experimental outcomes, along with energy consumption measurements and an energy efficiency analysis, substantiate that the suggested Easy Dynamic Direct Voltage Control (E-DDVC) technique is a promising alternative to current MTPA methodologies in interior-PMSM drives. This strategy demonstrates the ability to maintain high energy efficiency, particularly during dynamic operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensor Technology and Measurement SystemsFrench-language works237,207