Clustering Menggunakan Algoritma K-Means untuk Mengelompokan Data Perjudian Berdasarkan Wilayah di Kota Binjai (Studi Kasus : Pengadilan Negeri Binjai)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Binjai District Court is a government agency that has the duty and authority to receive, examine and decide every case registered at the Binjai District Court. The Binjai District Court handles many gambling cases, but data management is still not fast and accurate because it still uses manual methods, so the agency needs to implement an application system. To solve this problem, you can use data mining applications, namely by utilizing existing data to dig up new information. One of the techniques in data mining is clustering. Clustering was chosen because it can group data according to the desired characteristics, in this research it means grouping gambling data in the Binjai City area. The clustering algorithm used is K-Means Clustering integrated into a desktop-based programming application. The conclusion obtained is that the system designed has proven successful in grouping gambling data into 3 clusters (groups). The process using MATLAB R2014a obtained results in group 1 which amounted to 276 data with a data centroid center (6.92; 2.41; 4.33) including the category of low levels of gambling, group 2 which amounted to 337 data with a data centroid center (7.56 ; 2.10; 14.48) is included in the category of moderate level of gambling and group 3 which amounts to 387 data with the centroid data (7.56; 2.10; 28.02) is included in the category of high level of gambling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it