MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404630214 · doi:10.1016/j.slast.2024.100227

Automatic cleaning in acoustic ejection mass spectrometry: Enhancing the system robustness for large-scale high-throughput analysis of complex samples

2024· article· en· W4404630214 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSLAS TECHNOLOGY · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsFlex (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Mass spectrometryThroughputComputer scienceChemistryProcess engineeringChromatographyEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid evolution of high-throughput mass spectrometry (HT-MS) technologies has positioned MS as a pivotal analytical tool across diverse disciplines. Its significance is particularly pronounced in high-throughput drug discovery and development, where MS plays a critical role throughout various phases. Acoustic ejection mass spectrometry (AEMS) is a recent addition to the HT-MS landscape, showcasing a balanced performance high analytical throughput and high data quality. Particularly, AEMS's in-line dilution feature allows the direct analysis of large-scale, complex reaction solutions without the need for sample cleanup, making it a popular choice for large-scale high-throughput screenings. However, the substantial volume of complex matrix introduces concerns about system robustness, specifically regarding the potential clogging of the sample transfer line. This study addresses this challenge by introducing an integrated automatic washing feature to the AEMS system. This enhancement significantly improves system robustness without imposing any additional demands on assay execution time. Demonstrating an extended electrode lifetime, the cleaning approach proves effective in maintaining system performance over prolonged periods, showcasing its potential for continuous large-sample-scale high-throughput analysis applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it