MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404657156 · doi:10.1186/s13007-024-01304-1

A high-throughput approach for quantifying turgor loss point in grapevine

2024· article· en· W4404657156 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Methods · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsNiagara CollegeThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto ScarboroughNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsTurgor pressureVineVitis viniferaBiologyDrought toleranceIntraspecific competitionContext (archaeology)HorticultureHygrometerCropViticultureAgronomyBotanyEnvironmental scienceHumidityEcologyWineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Quantifying drought tolerance in crops is critical for agriculture management under environmental change, and drought response traits in grape vine have long been the focus of viticultural research. Turgor loss point ( π tlp ) is gaining attention as an indicator of drought tolerance in plants, though estimating π tlp often requires the construction and analysis of pressure-volume (P-V) curves which are very time consuming. While P-V curves remain a valuable tool for assessing π tlp and related traits, there is considerable interest in developing high-throughput methods for rapidly estimating π tlp , especially in the context of crop screening. We tested the ability of a dewpoint hygrometer to quantify variation in π tlp across and within 12 clones of grape vine ( Vitis vinifera subsp. vinifera ) and one wild relative ( Vitis riparia ), and compared these results to those derived from P-V curves. At the leaf-level, methodology explained only 4–5% of the variation in π tlp while clone/species identity accounted for 39% of the variation, indicating that both methods are sensitive to detecting intraspecific π tlp variation in grape vine. Also at the leaf level, π tlp measured using a dewpoint hygrometer approximated π tlp values ( r 2 = 0.254) and conserved π tlp rankings from P-V curves (Spearman’s ρ = 0.459). While the leaf-level datasets differed statistically from one another (paired t -test p = 0.01), average difference in π tlp for a given pair of leaves was small (0.1 ± 0.2 MPa (s.d.)). At the species/clone level, estimates of π tlp measured by the two methods were also statistically correlated ( r 2 = 0.304), did not deviate statistically from a 1:1 relationship, and conserved π tlp rankings across clones (Spearman’s ρ = 0.692). The dewpoint hygrometer (taking ∼ 10–15 min on average per measurement) captures fine-scale intraspecific variation in π tlp , with results that approximate those from P-V curves (taking 2–3 h on average per measurement). The dewpoint hygrometer represents a viable method for rapidly estimating intraspecific variation in π tlp , and potentially greatly increasing replication when estimating this drought tolerance trait in grape vine and other crops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it