MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Feasibility-guaranteed machine learning unit commitment: Fuzzy Optimization approaches

2024· article· en· W4404694283 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Energy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnit (ring theory)Fuzzy logicPower system simulationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematical optimizationMathematicsElectric power systemMathematics educationPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unit commitment (UC) problem is solved several times daily in a limited amount of time and is commonly formulated using mixed-integer linear programs (MILP). However, solution time for MILP formulation increases exponentially with the number of binary variables required. To address this, machine learning (ML) models have been attempted with limited success as they cannot be trained for all scenarios, whereby they may contain false predictions leading to infeasibility, hindering their practical applicability. To overcome these issues, we first propose a hybrid deep learning model comprising a convolutional neural network (CNN) and bidirectional long-short-term memory (BiLSTM) to predict the UC decisions. Second, we incorporate these predictions as non-binding fuzzy constraints, enhancing the traditional UC model and creating an ML-fuzzy UC model. Two implementations of non-binding fuzzy constraints are studied. The first develops each ML decision variable as a separate fuzzy set, while the second creates one fuzzy set per hour, considering all decisions within. Introducing ML-UC decisions as non-binding fuzzy constraints ensures the ML-fuzzy UC model has a feasible solution if the basic MILP-UC problem does, while leveraging ML predictions. Moreover, the proposed model benefits from a reduced solution space, leading to substantial reductions in computing time. Results on IEEE 118-bus and Polish 2383-bus systems demonstrate 92 % and 89 % computation time reductions for both systems, respectively and achieve 100 % feasibility for both seen and unseen datasets when the basic MILP-UC problem has a feasible solution. • A hybrid CNN and BiLSTM model was created to provide the unit commitment schedules. • ML predictions modeled as non-binding fuzzy constraints enhancing MILP-UC formulation. • Fuzzy constraints improved ML decision utilization, ensuring 100 % feasibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it