RETRACTED: Behavioural Activation and Inhibition Systems of Fathers, Child Abuse and Childhood Psychopathology: The Mediating Role of Demographics
Post-publication record
OpenAlex flags this work as retracted, but it carries no matching Retraction Watch record in this frame.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study aimed to investigate the direct and indirect influences of fathers' behavioural activation/inhibition systems (BAS/BIS) on the abuse and psychopathology of their children about the mediating role of father and child demographics using a structural equation modelling (SEM) in maltreated children. The participants of this study were 384 abused children and their fathers who were selected by a random sampling method within a cross‐sectional study. A demographic questionnaire, the Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems scale (BAS/BIS), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire‐Short Form (CTQ‐SF) and the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment‐Teacher's Report Form (ASEBA‐TRF) were used for data collection. The fathers' BAS/BIS with the mediating role of father and child demographics altogether explained 54% of variations in the physical, sexual, emotional and neglect dimensions of child abuse, whereas fathers' BAS/BIS with the mediating role of father and child demographics explained 88.1% of variations in all subscales of psychopathology in maltreated children. This conceptual model shows the direct and indirect effects of fathers' BAS/BIS on child abuse and childhood psychopathology with the mediating role of demographic variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".