MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404748967 · doi:10.15829/1728-8800-2024-4127

Efficiency of cognitive-behavioral group therapy for obesity in combination with dietary modifications in women

2024· article· en· W4404748967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY AND PREVENTION · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObesityCognitionCognitive behavioral therapyClinical psychologyInternal medicinePhysical therapyGerontologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data are accumulating on the direct influence of psychoemotional and psychosocial factors on the inexorable growth of obesity prevalence, and therefore the concept of an interdisciplinary approach is needed, including dietary, physical activity and mental state modifications. Aim . To determine the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral group the­ra­py (CBGT) in combination with nutritional modifications for body mass (BM) management in women with obesity. Material and methods . The study involved 20 women (mean age 46,6±12,3 years) with a BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 , rigid to diet therapy. A medical psychologist and a nutritionist conducted CBGT sessions with the participants. Initially, BM, BM index, and eating behavior were assessed (DEBQ, Stunkard, CARDIA questionnaires). In addition, the following were used to study the mental status: Toronto Alexithymia Scale ­(TAS-20), vital exhaustion test, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale, Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA), Reeder Stress Inventory, and Psychological Stress Measure (PSM-25). The changes were studied 8 weeks after the start CBGT. Results . After 2 months, the BMI dynamics was -4,33 kg (p<0,001). A decrease in the severity of emotional eating behavior by an average of 0,77 (p<0,001), external eating behavior by 1,05 (p<0,001) points was noted, no significant changes in restrained eating behavior were obtained (p=0,43). According to the CARDIA test, after 2 months of CBGT, the detection rate of pathological significance of BM decreased by 50% (p<0,001); as well as episodes of loss of control over food intake (initially in 5 (25%) (p<0,001)), distress due to loss of control over food intake (initially in 6 (30%) (p<0,001). CBGT in combination with dietary intervention showed a decrease in the severity of chronic stress, which corresponded to an increase in the total score from 1,8±0,75 to 2,0±0,60 (p<0,05), a decrease in vital exhaustion from 5,6±3,89 to 4,1±2,66 (p=0,001) and loneliness from 34,9±12,61 to 29,9±7,57 (p=0,007), a decrease in guilt-proneness from 53,0±8,42 to 42,8±11,18 (p<0,001) and shame-proneness from 38,3±10,99 to 31,6±10,07 points (p=0,014). Conclusion . The mental state of a person has a significant impact on eating behavior and on the regulation of BM, which emphasizes the need for complex interventions to provide effective assistance to people with obesity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it