MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404767301 · doi:10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100343

Price disorder and information content in energy and gold markets: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic

2024· article· en· W4404767301 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Nexus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMarket Dynamics and Volatility
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Content (measure theory)Energy (signal processing)BusinessEconomicsVirologyMedicinePhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Estimate the correlation dimension, Lyapunov exponent, and approximate entropy in gold and energy markets. • Examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. • The pandemic altered price disorder and information content. • Gold market not attractive during the pandemic. • Heating oil and gasoline markets offer interesting investment opportunities during the pandemic. In this paper, we examine market efficiency in fossil energy and gold markets. Specifically, we study price disorder and information content in various energy markets and in gold market before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The set of energy markets include West Texas Intermediate (WTI), Brent, natural gas, heating oil, and gasoline. For each market, we estimated the correlation dimension, Lyapunov exponent, and approximate entropy for periods before and during the pandemic. In this regard, we contribute to the literature by using different nonlinear features to provide a rich description of the nonlinear dynamics in price evolution before and during the pandemic, considering five various energy and gold markets, and examining a longer and recent period spanning from November 2017 to November 2022. The empirical results show that, during the pandemic, complexity increased in gold and natural gas markets, stability strongly decreased in WTI and natural gas markets, and irregularity obviously increased in gold market but decreased in all energy markets. Besides, heating oil and gasoline markets appear to be unaffected by the COVID-19 pandemic especially in terms of complexity and stability compared to WTI, Brent, and gas markets. We conclude that the gold market maybe not attractive compared to energy markets for investors and traders during the pandemic. Besides, heating oil and gasoline markets offer interesting investment opportunities during the world economic downturn caused the outbreak of the pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it