Effects of Zr Addition on Magnetic Susceptibility of Novel Biocompatible Ti-10Mo-(x)Zr Alloys for Biomedical Implants.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the reduction of magnetic susceptibility depending on Zr element addition to the novel Ti-Mo-xZr alloy used for biomedical applications. Low magnetic susceptibility is essential for biomaterials to enable implant material to adapt inside the human body for a long time, prohibiting implant rejection and avoiding interference with the magnetic field through MRI examination. Zr addition to Ti-10Mo reduced magnetic susceptibility to a lower level than commercial Ti64 bio-implants (3.71×10−6 cm3/g), and TMZ6 alloy magnetic susceptibility (3.11×10-6 cm3/g) is lower than CP-Ti (3.38 ×10−6 cm3/g). Mo-equivalent and magnetic susceptibilities are claimed to be proportional inversely. The magnetization curves of entirely studied Ti-alloys are observed to maintain linearity, representing paramagnetic properties suitable for bio-implants and stable during MRI examinations. The results revealed that the addition of 6 wt.% Zr in Ti-Mo-xZr alloy reduces the magnetic susceptibilities from 3.088×10-6 to 2.967×10-6 cm3.g-1. Measured and calculated magnetic susceptibility obtained the same behavior as Zr addition with different slopes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it