MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404797740 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.669

Privacy Preserving Genomic Data Imputation using Autoencoders

2024· article· en· W4404797740 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceImputation (statistics)Data miningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMissing data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Next-generation sequencing technologies have significantly increased the availability of genomic databases. These databases can be used for numerous applications in genome-wide association studies, such as disease prediction and precision medicine. Missing values in genotype data diminish the database quality. Genotype imputation is an essential low-cost tool in genomics that statistically infers missing genotype variants from an experimentally observed set of variants. Owing to the computationally intensive nature of the problem, genotype imputation is often outsourced to an external service provider. However, sharing genomic data as a plaintext raises privacy concerns and leaks sensitive information. Existing privacy-preserving approaches perform genotype imputation using linear classification models, which require training a separate classifier for each variant using previously labeled data. Self-supervised deep learning models, such as autoencoders, have recently become popular because of their ability to model complex patterns in genomic datasets and achieve significantly high accuracy. However, deep learning-based genotype imputation under a privacy-preserving setting remains largely unexplored. In this work, we propose a novel adaptation of an autoencoder-based genotype imputation model that preserves the privacy of sensitive genomic data. To our knowledge, ours is the first work to do so. Genomic data privacy is preserved using fully homomorphic encryption (FHE). FHE schemes enable Efficient computations over encrypted data but suffer from noise growth as the number of computations increases. To overcome the issue of noise growth due to computationally complex deep learning, we use neural network quantization, which considerably reduces the network size while achieving high accuracy, as demonstrated in our results. We present all the necessary parameters to perform deep learning-based genotype imputation in the privacy-preserving setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.010
Open science0.0920.269
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it