Accurate Spatial Heterogeneity Dissection and Gene Regulation Interpretation for Spatial Transcriptomics using Dual Graph Contrastive Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advances in spatial transcriptomics have enabled simultaneous preservation of high-throughput gene expression profiles and the spatial context, enabling high-resolution exploration of distinct regional characterization in tissue. To effectively understand the underlying biological mechanisms within tissue microenvironments, there is a requisite for methods that can accurately capture external spatial heterogeneity and interpret internal gene regulation from spatial transcriptomics data. However, current methods for region identification often lack the simultaneous characterizing of spatial structure and gene regulation, thereby limiting the ability of spatial dissection and gene interpretation. Here, stDCL is developed, a dual graph contrastive learning method to identify spatial domains and interpret gene regulation in spatial transcriptomics data. stDCL adaptively incorporates gene expression data and spatial information via a graph embedding autoencoder, thereby preserving critical information within the latent embedding representations. In addition, dual graph contrastive learning is proposed to train the model, ensuring that the latent embedding representation closely resembles the actual spatial distribution and exhibits cluster similarity. Benchmarking stDCL against other state-of-the-art clustering methods using complex cortex datasets demonstrates its superior accuracy and effectiveness in identifying spatial domains. Our analysis of the imputation matrices generated by stDCL reveals its capability to reconstruct spatial hierarchical structures and refine differential expression assessment. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the versatility of stDCL in interpretability of gene regulation, spatial heterogeneity at high resolution, and embryonic developmental patterns. In addition, it is also showed that stDCL can successfully annotate disease-associated astrocyte subtypes in Alzheimer's disease and unravel multiple relevant pathways and regulatory mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".