MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404838487 · doi:10.1002/0471654507.erfme132

Mobile Radio Channels

2005· other· en· W4404838487 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of RF and Microwave Engineering · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article we describe the properties of a communications channel when one or both of the radio terminals is moving. Examples of such channels occur with vehicular terminals and cell phones. However, some properties of these channels also occur in links where some form of multipath occurs, such as point‐to‐point links, where there is also a ground bounce path; long‐range point‐to‐point links with atmospheric refractive paths; and non‐line‐of‐sight links, which rely on radiowave scattering for the propagation paths. The changing phase mix of the multipath causes signal fading and propagation paths. The changing phase mix of the multipath causes signal fading and Doppler shifts in the channel, and these conspire to degrade the quality and capacity of both analog and digital communications. The physical link characteristics and their effects on a digital link are described using tractible mathematical and statistical models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it